autosboatselectronicsfinancehealthcarehomesinsurancetelecomtravel

Archives

Advertisement

« November 2007 | Main | January 2008 »

December 26, 2007

Camry, Accord—2 Best-Selling Cars In U.S.

Our two youngest sons, ages 18 and 20, have grown up with little idea of the distinction between domestic and imported cars. Toyota and Honda are familiar brands that seem just as American to them as Ford or Chevrolet. Throughout the second decade of their lives, the Toyota Camry and Honda Accord midsize sedans have been the 2 best-selling cars in the U.S.—quite a difference from when the Ford Taurus was the top selling car (1992 through 1996). This year will be the 11th consecutive year that the Camry and Accord are the top-selling cars in the U.S., according to data from J.D. Power and Associates.


One of our senior research analysts, Tom Libby, points out that since late 2004, several all-new midsize car models (Ford Fusion, Mercury Milan and Dodge Avenger—which replaces the Dodge Stratus) or redesigns (Nissan Altima and Chrysler Sebring) have been introduced—all with the goal to cut into the lead of the Camry and Accord. However, Camry and Accord owners have remained remarkably loyal, Libby says.

Trade-in data from the Power Information Network (PIN), a division of J.D. Power and Associates, indicates that the loyalty of Camry and Accord owners has remained remarkably stable during the past 3 years. Libby said that Camry and Accord owners' loyalty to their respective models actually climbed considerably when each model was redesigned.

The sixth-generation Camry was introduced in March 2006 as a 2007 model. During the first and second quarters of 2006, 35% and 35.5% of Camry owners traded for the new Camry. Nearly two years later, in the fourth quarter of this year (October through December 16, 2007) the percentage of owners trading for another Camry was even higher (35.8%).


Loyalty to the all-new generation 2008 Accord, which was launched in September 2007 also, has climbed. Before the redesign in the second quarter of 2007, less than one-fourth (24.7%) of Accord owners traded for another Accord. After the redesign in the third quarter of 2007, the percentage jumped six points to 30.8% and in the fourth quarter, more than one-third of Accord buyers (35.8%) traded for the Accord model.

More than 772,000 new Camry and Accord models were purchased through the first 11 months of the year and both models accounted for 37.6% of the midsize conventional car segment's sales, according to the J.D. Power and Associates Sales Report. Both models also fare better than most in terms of initial quality and dependability on our firm's studies, which influenced my husband and me to buy a used Camry and Accord for our two youngest sons. Who knows what they will select when it comes time for them to buy their own vehicles? But it's likely to be what they see as an American model—a Toyota or a Honda.


December 20, 2007

What It's Like to Drive in Italy

My wife and I took a two-week vacation in Italy this year: our favorite country to visit. We love almost everything about Italy: the weather, the food, the wine, the scenery, the history, the culture, the language, the passion its people exhibit for living. It is a place where life is relished, cherished, and gorged upon with feverish delight.

It is also a place where death is cheated every day.

Evidently, there are few rules of the road in Italy, and those that do exist aren't enforced with any rigor by the Carabinieri. Aggravating this fact, Italian drivers aren't nearly as serious about the craft as German drivers. They are all over the road, exhibiting the lane discipline and speed limit observation of drunken frat boys with the keys to Daddy's BMW M5. Which is why, when I rented a 2007 Fiat Punto Grande from the Avis lot at Amerigo Vespucci Aeroporto di Firenze, I paid for the full insurance. Hey, I've been to Italy before. I've seen how banged up the cars are.

Before our trip, my State Farm agent told me that my policy's rental car coverage didn't include overseas trips. I figured the chances of scraping a bumper or denting the Punto's sheet metal were high, and because our trip included plans to drive south of Naples where, rumor has it, vehicle theft is a problem, I wanted to make sure that if I returned the Fiat with no doors, sagging bumpers, and smoke rising from the engine bay that I wouldn't owe a dime toward repairs. Full coverage, baby, no deductible.

As a pedestrian, you cannot take crossing the street lightly. Rome ain't Los Angeles, where people will step out into traffic and just assume cars will stop—and then get indignant when they're almost mowed down for forgetting what their mothers should have taught them: Look both ways before crossing the street.

Like L.A., Rome has crosswalks, but Rome also has swarms of bicycles, scooters, motorcycles, taxis, cars, trucks, and buses vying for space on narrow streets and alleyways. Eventually, enough of them will stop, or slow down, long enough for you to create a few inches of clearance between their bumpers and your legs, but this is not a place where one can blithely assume that the pedestrian is guaranteed safe passage. I watched an elderly tourist ignore a crosswalk signal near the Forum, and when she was halfway across the street, a horde of vehicles came ripping around a corner, filling pavement that had been vacant for as far as the eye could see just a moment before. She froze, traffic zipping and buzzing by all around her, until finally a group of scooters stopped to let her hobble the rest of the way across the street. If you're vacationing in Italy, my advice is to obey the signals or be ready to run.

As a motorist, Americans driving in Italy must adopt an entirely new mindset and driving style. Manhattan cab drivers would fit right in. Everyone else needs to buckle up, grit their teeth, grip the steering wheel until their knuckles turn white, and compete. Yep, I said compete. Perhaps appropriately—considering the proximity of the Coliseum, where man and beast regularly slaughtered one another—driving is often a brutal competition. Don't bother talking on your cell phone, don't listen to loud music, don't try to sip your Lavazza latte, and don't try to scarf leftovers from the Autogrill while you're driving in Italy. Your senses must be keen, and you've gotta be ready to react to almost anything.

Lane markings? Italy don't need no stinking lane markings! At a traffic light, Italians squeeze as many cars into the front line as will fit, and then the bicycles, scooters and motorcycles back-fill the remaining space. When the light turns green, everyone goes at the same time, and goes as fast as possible because there's a stream of vehicles six lanes wide trying to be first across the intersection and into one of two available traffic lanes. The winners are those who took no prisoners. Everyone else is getting honked at.

Think you'll be a nice guy and let somebody merge in front of you? That's a big mistake, because it's not as simple as letting someone have a turn and then assuming you'll get yours. Give 'em an inch and they'll take a mile, the old saying goes, and if you let anybody into traffic in front of you, plan on letting at least 10 more cars behind that first one in, too. And while you sit there, inching forward, eventually not caring about tapping another car, all the traffic behind you will be honking and yelling out of open windows.

Passing traffic is fun. Italy is ribboned with lots of two-lane, twisty roads that have little to no shoulder. The solid center line is a suggestion that passing slower traffic might not be prudent, but Italians just don't care. Vroooom, off they go, around the tour bus or the ugly American who hasn't yet mastered a manual transmission. And if they're passing on a curve and someone comes around the corner right at 'em, everyone somehow squeezes together to make enough space and avoid an accident. And yes, if you don't have the guts to risk a pass, people will honk at you.

Drivers can't worry about all those people on motorbikes, either, though I did go easy on a family of four that was puttering through downtown Naples on an ancient scooter during the insanity that is the Corso Umberto in the hour before siesta. Most of these bikers aren't wearing helmets, and they ride their Vespas and Ducatis and Moto Guzzis as if death was not a possibility. At one point, while traveling the coastal road between Sorrento and Positano, we watched a bare-headed motorcyclist zoom around a cliff-side curve, bike leaned way over, head skimming mere inches from the rock and concrete barrier between the road and the huge drop to the ocean below. Scooter drivers are just as bad, passing on the left and whizzing past oncoming traffic with little margin of error between their handles and the side mirrors of moving automobiles.

You've gotta watch out for the tour buses, too, especially on the Amalfi Coast, where tight blind curves are the rule. The buses frequently take up the entire road, and sometimes all oncoming motorists will get is a toot on a loud and irritating horn before tons of sheet metal appears, taking up half of your lane. Be ready to brake and dive, keep the stereo turned down, and keep the windows open so you can hear the blare of impending doom.

As daunting as this all sounds, we had great fun driving in Italy. Liz doesn't get carsick and likes to go fast, so I pushed the Punto as hard as I could on the roads drizzled across the mountains and cliffs of the Amalfi Coast, passing the airport shuttles and tour buses when it clearly wasn't safe, making room for those engaged in similar behavior as necessary, and generally driving like a complete jerk. In Sorrento we turned onto a side street that narrowed into an alley, so we tucked the mirrors in and squeezed through with nary an inch of clearance on either side of the car, wondering what we might do if the Punto became wedged between the walls. In Naples, we raced across the intersections in the battle to be first. In Rome, I behaved like a motorized maniac, rarely giving an inch and never letting anyone merge in front of me. And when we finally turned the Punto back in, there wasn't a dent, or a scrape, or a wisp of underhood smoke that hadn't already existed before we picked up the car.

The car itself wasn't bad. I selected the Fiat over a more stylish Renault Megane because I figured I might as well drive an Italian car in Italy. About the size of a Ford Focus ZX5, the Punto Grande was a diesel with a manual transmission, but I couldn't tell you anything about fuel economy except to say that I filled it twice during the week at a cost of $75 per tank. The engine was torquey enough but ran out of juice as revs climbed, though it could cruise at 160 km on the Autostrada,. The shifter was disappointing, a floppy and vague utensil jutting from the center console, yet the clutch was very easy to modulate. Like most European cars, the Fiat featured a supple ride, a communicative suspension, and good body control. The absolutely numb electric steering featured a handy button to switch assist levels for the city and the highway, making the Fiat easier to park at low speeds and giving the steering an appreciable heft on the Autostrada.

The Punto's rather odd-looking front end reminded me of Jaguar's new XK—distorted to economy car proportions, of course—and the rear end had the high mounted taillights that used to be on the Focus. Inside, materials were on par with American econocars, but the seats were terrific and the steering wheel was a pleasure to hold. All in all, the Fiat Punto Grande was unremarkable, and most of those we saw on the roads appeared to be rentals driven by tourists, making it the Chevy Cobalt of Italy.

Still, we'll remember that little dark gray car fondly. It helped us to cheat death while relishing, cherishing, and gorging upon life in the cities, countryside and coastal hideaways of our favorite European country.

December 19, 2007

Why I Loved My 'Cuda

As a teenager, I daydreamed about driving a small European sports car through a Gymkhana club course—an MGB, a Triumph Spitfire, a Morgan roadster. In college, I got a little closer to sports cars by dating guys who owned and drove small foreign-made convertibles. I dated Peter who drove a cute red MG Midget and Jeff who had a maroon Austin Healey Bugeye Sprite that he tuned for racing. We sped around the same winding roads in Minnesota that Prince navigated on his Harley in the movie "Purple Rain." The piéce de résistance was getting a chance to drive Lonnie's father's silver Corvette Stingray coupe as it slid around corners on ice in Minnesota winter (even with 4-wheel disc brakes).

Finally, it was time to find my own sports car. I had discovered a used yellow VW Karmann Ghia that had few rust holes (from street salt) and still managed to sound as though it might make it through another Minnesota winter. But my dad thought otherwise. Instead, he offered to help me pull together a payment for a newer car. My father didn't want me stranded in a Ghia that wouldn't go when it was 20 below. I wanted a convertible. After working out a deal with the local dealership, where my family bought all of their cars—Plymouth RoadRunners, Dodge Chargers and Chrysler 300s—I ended up with a 1971 Plymouth Baracuda convertible.

The Baracuda had been on the market since 1964; Plymouth made them for 10 years. It was an American muscle car. The only one available to me was a Curious Yellow '71 'Cuda with white top that was powered by a 340 engine. (Plymouth also offered the Baracuda with 318-, a 383-, and 440-cubic-inch engines in addition to the 426 Hemi.) The interior was supreme: black vinyl bucket seats, a simulated wood steering wheel and shifter knob and a 4-speed manual transmission—perfect for peeling out.


My 'Cuda was a performance model built on a new shorter version of the B-Platform. Its near-twin was the Dodge Challenger, which had a slightly longer wheelbase. This car was no MGB, but it did take design cues from the Chevrolet Camaro and it packed power. Plus it was an eye-catcher in yellow with a white top. Dan Gurney and Swede Savage raced 'Cudas with 340 "6-pack" engines (three 2-barrel carburetors) in the Trans-Am Series.

I had great times taking off from stop lights on Lake Street in Minneapolis (the drag strip between the Twin Cities) to pull ahead of Mustangs, GTOs and tricked-out Dusters. I had the 'Cuda for two years, and then sold it to my brother, so I could go off to Austria for a year of German studies. He had the car for a year and then sold it. Recently, I found a yellow model for sale on eBay with an asking price of more than $185,000—now a collector's 'Cuda. I don't expect to own another muscle car or a foreign sporty convertible in the near future—but it certainly is fun to reminisce about and I still have photos of my Banana Cuda in a scrapbook.

December 18, 2007

Paradigm Shifts

Like my Dad says, "You don't know what you don't know." Until you experience the outer limits of a particular endeavor, you can't truly understand what is achievable. That experience completely and permanently rearranges your assumptions of what is possible. In other words, it causes a paradigm shift.

I have had many such experiences. My first was in a 1991 Corvette ZR-1. A friend let me drive his nearly 400-hp speed machine. Prior to that, I thought my 1988 Mustang GT with 300 lb.-ft. of torque was fast, but the Corvette ZR-1 was considerably faster. The Corvette ZR-1 changed my perceptions of what fast really meant.

My next foray into rearranging mental perceptions was in a modified 4-wheel-drive Chevy Blazer. The driver said to me, "See that nearly vertical incline covered by soft dirt and slippery rocks? We're going to drive straight to the top." My response was something like, "Hmm, huh, what... are you kidding?"

We proceeded slowly and cautiously. Looking out the windshield, I couldn't even see the ground; all I could see was bright blue sky. Halfway up the mountain, we came to a complete stop. Gripped by visions of our sliding backwards, out of control, I asked to get out, which was of course a ridiculous request driven purely by anxiety and fear. That experience changed my beliefs about what a talented off-road driver and good 4-wheel-drive vehicle could accomplish.

Several years later my perceptions of fast were again changed when my friend let me drive his Kawasaki Ninja ZX-11—a 4-cylinder, 1100-cc motorcycle that could do the quarter mile in 10.25 seconds at 135 mph! Like many motorcycles, it could do wheelies, but this bike did so with almost no provocation; all it needed was full throttle in first gear. It seemed to enjoy going fast, practically begging the rider to push its limits.

Recently I drove a vehicle that changed my perceptions of what a luxury car should be. The $70,000 (with options) Audi Q7 featured extremely comfortable seats, an optional air suspension that maintained a level ride under all conditions, and an impressive 14-speaker Bose surround sound system. What impressed me most was the seamless integration of its leading-edge technology features such as Active Cruise Control, which automatically maintains a user-defined distance behind the car in front, and Lane Assist, which alters the driver if he is about to make an unsafe lane change. In a vehicle like the Q7, driving becomes engaging and entertaining, and easier and safer as a result.

Let us know about your paradigm shifts.—

December 13, 2007

Why I Loved My 1992 Pontiac Grand Am Coupe

My '87 Nissan Maxima, nicknamed "Battle Cat," had finally succumbed to her war wounds. I was in a bad accident in 2000, but Battle Cat's transmission lasted a year afterwards before it died on me. For a year after that, I spent hours on the bus every day, migrating between school, work, and home. I was in my junior year in college; there was no possible way I could afford a car payment because the majority of my income was applied to rent and utilities. My best bet was to scour the weekly recyclers for a "bucket" that I could buy for $2,000 or less. Then one day I came across an advertisement from Top Star Auto Sales that a Black 1992 Pontiac Grand Am coupe was on sale for $1,250.


On Saturday my friend Sal and I went to the dealership to take a look at this car. I had assumed it would be coming apart at the seams, but to my surprise the car was in good shape. The interior was intact; I saw no scratches in the paint; the engine was a 3.3-liter V-6—but there was a catch. The car had over 185,000 miles on it. After a test drive and a quick inspection of the engine I had made my decision. I was going to purchase the vehicle, high mileage, no warranty and all. I figured by the time this car gave out on me I would be out of school and would have an income that could support a car payment. I was proud of myself at that moment because this was the first car that I purchased completely on my own. There was no input from my parents on what car I should purchase, no financial help, no help with the negotiations. After paying the salesman in cash, I drove the Grand Am off into the sunset.


You never appreciate the feeling of being behind the wheel until it is taken away from you. That is why enjoyed letting that 3.3-liter V-6 engine roar. The Grand Am was eventually dubbed "Black Cat" because it was sleek and powerful yet graceful. I drove that car everywhere. The majority of the time I was driving back and forth from Northridge to my home town of Bakersfield. Within the trip there is a mountain pass with steep grade on Interstate 5, called the Grapevine, and Black Cat handled it as though it were the flat prairie lands of Kansas. Since it was a coupe, Black Cat gave me the perfect excuse not to transport my friends around. Everything was going great until the day the alternator went out. I took it to one of those chain repair garages. While they took care of the alternator they screwed up the water pump and the coolant reservoir.

The company ducked their responsibilities and left me with $1,500 worth of repairs. There was no way I could justify pouring that much money into car that was rapidly approaching the 210,000 mile mark. That was when the Black Cat and I had to part ways—but I loved that car and still compare the feeling I got from driving Black Cat to any other vehicle I drive today.

December 12, 2007

Does It Have To Be A Camry?

Last Saturday, my husband and I took our youngest son shopping for a reliable used car. He already has had a year behind the wheel, in his 1995 blue Honda Accord station wagon that has more than 165,000 miles on the odometer. We are passing this first car on to our youngest son's older brother, also a college student, who is much less interested in driving and more concerned with creating video games and playing "World of Warcraft" on the computer. He solely needs a car to commute to and from school.

Our 18-year-old does a lot more driving because he is a pitcher on his college baseball team and has to drive to 5:30 a.m. workouts, practices, fundraising events (such as serving as a security guard at USC football games at the Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum sports stadium) and daily commutes to school with friends. He is a more practiced driver and seems to have a natural ability in terms of motor skills and response time in a car.


Safety and price were the most important factors as we began our search, especially since we are paying for the car. My husband wanted to check out used Volvos since he claims they are durable and have a safety track record along with prices for used models in the $9,000 range. I suggested that we consider the "stalwart dependables" that rank well on J.D. Power and Associate's initial quality and vehicle dependability studies—Toyota and Honda models—which are also some of the best-selling vehicles in our state of California.

I am not an ardent Toyota fan. Their vehicles are not much fun to drive and many of their designs are bland. But it's hard to argue with J.D. Power and Associates' findings with regard to their reliability, dependability and quality. Older Toyota Camrys and Honda Accords generally receive between 4 and 5 out of 5 Power Circles in our quality ratings—which means these models—2001 and 2002 for example—are better than most or among the best in overall mechanical quality as well as design appeal and comfort.

Since the Toyota store on Pacific Coast Highway in Torrance was closest to home, it was our first stop. We were given a choice of older Camrys with 4-cylinder engines and lots of miles—none had odometer readings of less than 100,000 miles. Our son wasn't interested. I myself was more attracted by a used blue Celica that was in mint condition—but it was selling for $19,000. The salesman knew our needs and showed us three Camrys in the $10,000 price range: bland and durable.

Our son tested a 1999 black basic Camry and wanted to look at a 2001 red model that already had been sold. Neither of the cars were certified Toyotas but the salesman did show us clean CarFax reports on the first two models. Then the salesman showed us a 2002 Camry LE sedan in Aspen Green Pearl with low-profile 16-inch tires and alloy wheels. Our son loved the tires and wheels. However, the real selling point for our son was the aftermarket Sony 6-CD changer and audio system. This model also was powered by a standard 2.4-liter 4-cylinder engine that produces 157 hp. It had a little more pep climbing the hill than the previous generation 2001 model that was powered by the older 2.2-liter engine. In addition, the car only had one owner and had no accidents listed on the CarFax report.

And the price was right: $10,999 before sales tax, license and registration fees. Our son was excited. He sent text messages to his friends—before driving the car. When he drove the Camry home, he sat in the driveway with one of his buddies looking at the features and reading the manual. Now, our family (including three sons) has five vehicles in the driveway and parked on the street—more than we should have and our models represent the full contingent of the top volume automakers: GM, Ford, Honda, Nissan and now Toyota. And though I think they are less fun to drive, we can be thankful that our two youngest boys will be driving safe but still inexpensive durable autos—from Toyota and Honda—even if they do have high mileage.

December 11, 2007

What I Learned At MX-5 Driving School

Turn 8 at Mazda Raceway Laguna Seca, the premier road race track in the U.S., is fed by the Rahal Straight, which kinks up a lush green hillside to present a spectacular view across Monterey and Carmel to the ocean. As gorgeous as the scenery is, this is the worst spot on the track for distraction, because Turn 8 dumps into the infamous Corkscrew, a downhill left followed by an immediate, and fast, right that is virtually invisible from the turn-in point. Inexperienced drivers must align the nose of the car with an imposing oak tree on the distant side of Turn 9, and marked with a bright orange cone for the Skip Barber MX-5 Cup racing school, to successfully negotiate the Corkscrew.

Somehow, I missed that little detail during the morning classroom instruction and pre-lunch lead-and-follow sessions, and on my first-ever attempt to solo the infamous Corkscrew relied on blind faith, chucking the almost new Mazda Miata MX-5 left and saying a quick prayer. This method, not taught by the capable instructors at the Skip Barber school, didn't work. Instead of gracefully descending the hill and rocketing out of Turn 8A, I transformed the race-prepped MX-5 Cup car into an off-roader, bounding down the hill just to the left of the pavement, scraping the bottom of the car in the dirt and gravel, and plowing right into a giant orange cone serving as an apex marker. The cone's base wedged itself into the MX-5's radiator, which began spewing coolant all over the track. I knew the cone was stuck under the car through Turn 9, where it thumped out from under the rear of the Miata and tumbled across the blacktop, but I didn't realize that my car was disgorging fluids and rapidly losing its mojo until I came to a stop in the pits and heard the Skip Barber guys screaming: "Turn it off! Turn it off!"

So, lesson number one: Don't think you know the intricacies of a race track just because you've raced it on your PlayStation more times than you can count. Lesson number two: The new MX-5 makes for a terrific and relatively inexpensive racer that you can build yourself using Mazdaspeed parts for about $35,000. Lesson number three: Skip Barber is the place to go to learn how to extract maximum performance from the MX-5 Cup car.

Mazda has entered a multi-year agreement to supply the Skip Barber organization with support and driving school cars in the hopes that Skip Barber will feed more aspiring drivers into the Mazda motorsports funnel. This aligns perfectly with Mazda's grass-roots motorsports effort: Half of the Sports Car Club of America's production class club racers are driving Mazda products on any given weekend, and many of those cars are Miatas.

This little factoid makes the new-for-2007 Mazda MX-5 Cup school that much more important to Mazda's motorsports activities. Students spend three days learning how to maximize the Miata's performance potential in almost exactly the same cars that are competing in the SCCA Pro Racing Sirius Satellite Radio MX-5 Cup professional series. The tires and suspension settings on the school cars are little different from what gets raced, but that's about it.

Participants in the three-day MX-5 Cup racing school pay anywhere from $2,995 to $4,295 depending on the track where the school is taught, and at this writing 37 classes are scheduled through December of 2008 on tracks located around the country. I was fortunate enough to take a condensed single-day course at Mazda Raceway at Laguna Seca near Monterey, Calif., to get a sense of what students learn about driving 200-hp, 2,600-lb., race-prepped chick cars.

Day One starts, like each of the three days, with a classroom chalk talk to discuss the day's activities. Then, students and instructors hit the track to work on slalom, braking, and downshifting techniques. On Day Two things get more interesting as students learn advanced braking techniques and take to the main track for high-speed laps. Day Three builds on improving skills with racing techniques including drafting, passing, race starts, and racing in the rain. Once you've completed the three-day course, Skip Barber offers a one-day school that includes 100 miles of lapping the track to hone the skills you've learned. And if the cost of the three-day school is too steep, for less than $1,500 aspiring racers can take a one-day combo school that provides a little taste of everything, except for fries and a Coke.

Despite my utterly pathetic and disastrous driving on my first solo lap of Laguna Seca, the Skip Barber guys kindly put me in a different car after I'd rolled into the pits leaking coolant, and sent me on my way. Not long after heading back onto the track, I got flagged for pushing too hard through Turn Three, which is a little more than a 90-degree, high-speed turn, nearly putting the left wheels into the dirt. Adding further insult to injury, I couldn't shake the younger guys from Road & Track and Motor Trend on the autocross course or the main track, which reminded me that no matter how good I think I am, there's always someone better. And lighter.

Despite major hits to my ego, the MX-5 Cup racing school was a blast, I learned plenty, and now driving my Mazdaspeed Miata is more rewarding than ever. I highly recommend a Skip Barber course.


December 07, 2007

A $192,560 Sports Car?

In the automotive world, Porsche is practically synonymous with the term "sports car." The company's 911 model has been produced since 1963, when it was introduced as a 1964 model. Since that time, this icon has been continuously refined and improved to the point where today it is among the finest cars available for the serious sports car enthusiast.

Pushing the concept of niche marketing to its limit, Porsche offers 14 distinct 911 variants. The "entry level" 911 Carrera, with 325 hp and 273 lb.-ft. of torque, can scoot to 60 mph in 4.8 seconds, which is fast enough for most sports car aficionados. The base MSRP for the 911 is $73,500, which can increase quickly with the wide range of customized options that Porsche offers.

If that's not enough to satisfy your cravings, try the 911 Turbo for $126,200 (base price). With 480 hp and 460 lb.-ft. of torque, this rear-wheel drive/rear engine fun machine can get to 60 mph in a scant 3.7 seconds and continue to a top speed of 193 mph.

And if even the Turbo won't do, try the ultimate 911, the GT2. It uses the same basic 3.6-liter engine as the Turbo, but with larger turbochargers and some fine tuning of the intake manifold and boost pressure. Weighing only 3,200 lbs., this model kicks out 530 hp and 505 lb.-ft. of torque, and can deliver warp-speed trips to 100 from rest in 7.4 seconds. It completes the quarter mile in 11.5 seconds and can achieve a top speed of 204 mph. Talk about fast.

So, when someone asks you how much the best sports car costs, you can tell them the Porsche GT2 is a hair under $200,000. When they ask you why it costs so much, you can tell them about its best feature and how launch control works. Step 1: floor the accelerator with the clutch disengaged; Step 2: the computer determines the optimal revs for launch; Step 3: release the clutch for maximum acceleration without mechanical abuse; and Step 4: suffer from uncontrollable laughter after you go from 0-60 mph in less than 3.4 seconds.

Is the GT2 worth nearly $200,000? Only you can decide, but I can tell you that it's less expensive than the 2008 Ferrari F430 Scuderia (list price $220,000; 510 hp; and 0-60 in 3.5 seconds) and more expensive than the 604 horsepower Mercedes-Benz S65 AMG, which isn't quite a sports car but delivers stunning performance nonetheless (604 horsepower and 738 lbs. ft of torque!).

December 06, 2007

A Hummer by Chance

When I first saw the Hummer H3 parked in our driveway, I felt like hiding. In Victory Red with chrome trim, the vehicle appeared like a smaller version of the road hog Hummer H2 warrior—4WD and all. I couldn't believe my husband had rented a Hummer for our weekend trip to Mammoth Lakes in the California Sierra Mountains. Both of us care about fuel economy and I drive a compact vehicle.

I felt less perturbed when I learned that Hertz had given my husband the H3 instead of the 4WD Ford Explorer we had reserved. The reservation said "like vehicle." Since it was the Thanksgiving holiday weekend, we had been given a vehicle they still had available instead of what we had requested. One consolation was that the "like vehicle" was given to us at the same price as the Explorer. At least it wasn't the giant warrior H2 and it would give us a chance to experience a smaller version of the vehicle on steroids that has been so popular with Americans for the past few years.

The H3 resembles its big brother H2 in appearance, with the toothy grille and lots of chrome and boxy stature. In other words, it looks like a tank—a flashy one. It is smaller than the H2 and powered by a 3.7-liter, 5-cylinder engine. Also, the H3 is less expensive—the top list price with options is $37,545—and it gets better mileage than its siblings: 15 mpg on average. We started the trip with a full tank but had to spend $73 to fill it up again for our return travel. It's hardly fuel-efficient. But it is smaller, more affordable than the H2 and is considered a midsize utility vehicle. Also it shares the same platform as GM's midsize pickups: the Chevrolet Colorado and GMC Canyon.

So, what was our view after driving the mini-tank? We liked it better than we expected. The interior was pleasant and roomy, and gave the feeling of ultimate protection—especially with the higher, smaller windows. The leather seats were comfortable and the cupholders were just right for Starbucks refills—even a Vente. As for performance, the ride wasn't as bad as I'd expected from a vehicle built on a pickup truck platform and the turning circle was much better than I'd anticipated.

Some of the detriments: The vehicle lacked passing power—probably because of its heft (it weighs about 500 lbs. more than a 2007 Chevrolet Colorado 4WD extended cab pickup), although when pushed to 70 or 80 mph, the Hummer didn't have any trouble maintaining speed. Also, outward visibility through the small windows was less than adequate for safe driving at times. On Southern California roads, we noticed that motorists in sedans and smaller utilities or crossovers often passed us—possibly because the taller stance of the vehicle was annoying to motorists in smaller and lower vehicles.

When we began climbing up into the mountains, we had more Hummers for company—mainly the larger H2 models that are built on the previous generation Chevrolet Silverado HD platform. In difficult terrain and for snowy uphill climbs, this model and the H3 that we had rented probably serve its owners well. But since it was still early winter and snow and ice were minimal, we didn't have a real chance to test the Hummer's all-terrain and off-road benefits.

We enjoyed trying out the vehicle on a trip and decided that it might b a good vehicle in snow and ice—especially with the large-tread tires, stability control system, and 4WD. But, as my husband concluded, "It's better than I thought but not right for driving around town. It's a still a little too big and ungainly for me, especially with the small windows and blind spots in different driving conditions—such as when backing up or changing lanes." I agree with his verdict and add that I wouldn't want to drive around in something that doesn't fit my needs or image. I was glad to give up the H3 and return to my smaller Ford Escape.

Knights of the Flat Screen

Retro fashion. Retro cars. Retro movies. Retro TV shows being turned into movies. And now, the trend toward retro TV shows being turned back into TV shows (which might be redundant, like "chicken fried chicken"). The SciFi Channel brought "Battlestar Galactica" out of moth balls (also, if you haven't watched Tin Man, it's an interesting "Wicked-esque" reinterpretation on "The Wizard of Oz"); NBC brought us the "Bionic Woman"; and now, per our friends at Jalopnik, Michael Knight will be gracing our screens again as the "Knight Rider."

But there's a Starbuck-like twist (on the new Battle Star Galactica, Starbuck, formerly played by Dirk Benedict of "A-Team" fame is now played by a woman): The new KITT will be played by none other than a Mustang Shelby GT500KR.

Some might consider this sacrilege—like my buddy Oren, who was really upset by this news. These are probably the same people who after 30 years still bitch about the designated hitter. At the time "Knight Rider" was first introduced—1982—the Trans Am was still a cool car. It still should be, but it's no longer an option. Plus, take yourself back to 1982: If you're the producer and you're looking for a cool car, can you imagine choosing a Mustang of that vintage? The early 1980s was not exactly the Mustang's finest hour from an exterior design standpoint (hindsight being 20/20 and all).

Oren's argument was twofold. First, how can they possibly switch from a GM product to a Ford product? (His suggestion: KITT should be a Corvette.) Uh, what is "Ford probably paid more for the product placement,"Alex? I don't know that for a fact, but I'd say it's solid real-world speculation. The producers aren't paid to care about automotive lineage. And maybe, as I mentioned above, the producer cared about the automotive lineage, but GM just didn't have a product that would work. His second argument had more logic to it. At the time, the Trans Am was about slickness and technology. The Mustang has always been about pure, unadulterated power. It's like asking whom you want to represent your product: Hulk Hogan or Andre the Giant. I'll buy that argument, but at the end of the day, the Mustang is by far one of the coolest cars that's relatively affordable, and has broad appeal—especially with that all important male 18—34 age demographic.

So, if you're really bummed about this, read my prior blog about the Trans Am, and write to GM. (Incidentally, I found a really cool site that is taking GM's design into their own hands For the rest of you, enjoy the fact that there's a little bit more of the 80's to love right here in 2007!



Canada Deutschland United Kingdom